Framework for the Ethical Use of AI
in Language Education

A hierarchical framework of 4 principles, 8 guidelines, and 35 competence descriptors to support safe, responsible, purposeful and reflective AI use.

I
Safe
II
Responsible
III
Purposeful
IV
Reflective
Principle I Safe use of AI in language education

Are our uses of AI legally compliant, transparent, and risk-free?

GUIDELINE 1
Comply with legal requirements & institutional standards
  • Review terms of service and age restrictions before use
  • Ensure learners can legally consent; seek parental permission where needed
  • Attribute AI-generated content; protect learner intellectual property
  • Maintain accountability — teachers remain responsible for outcomes
  • EU AI Act 2025 prohibits emotion recognition and real-time facial recognition in schools
GUIDELINE 2
Safeguard data security & digital safety of all participants
  • Understand what data (voice, writing, metadata) AI tools collect
  • Vet tools for GDPR / FERPA compliance; check retention policies
  • Minimise personal data in prompts; avoid sharing identifiable work
  • Protect vulnerable learners (minors, migrants, refugees) from data misuse
  • Advocate for institutional data-protection policies
Key competences (1–10)
Interpret ToS Verify legal compliance Protect learner IP Maintain accountability Evaluate data practices Identify data collected Assess proportionality Raise awareness Protect vulnerable learners Advocate for policy
Did you know?
Some AI platforms (e.g. ChatGPT) allow users to opt out of model training via account settings → Settings → Data Controls → toggle off "Improve the model for everyone."
Principle II Responsible use of AI in language education

Does our use of AI position teaching as a force for positive change?

GUIDELINE 3
Promote social justice & linguistic and cultural diversity
  • Balance AI tasks with authentic human interaction
  • Monitor learner fatigue and disengagement from excessive AI use
  • Critically evaluate AI outputs for bias, stereotypes and cultural hegemony
  • Address infrastructure and access inequalities (TPACK development)
  • Use AI to support under-resourced languages and plurilingual learners
GUIDELINE 4
Foster environmental sustainability
  • Be aware of AI's carbon, water and energy footprint
  • Use calibrated, purposeful AI — not routine default use
  • Prefer open image banks over AI image generation where possible
  • Web searches use 10–30× less energy than AI-generated content
  • Push AI vendors to disclose environmental metrics per operation
Key competences (11–18)
Preserve human connection Evaluate knowledge access Promote equitable access Evaluate for bias Advance linguistic diversity Recognise environmental impact Minimise footprint Collective responsibility
Did you know?
Advanced LLMs still exhibit implicit biases — associating negative language with certain racial groups, linking women with humanities over science, and favouring men in leadership contexts (Maslej et al., 2025).
Principle III Purposeful use of AI in language education

How does AI add genuine pedagogical value to teaching and learning?

GUIDELINE 5
Enhance sound language teaching pedagogy
  • Prioritise quality of AI use over quantity of AI tools
  • Use AI for personalised, differentiated learning pathways
  • Support assessment redesign: shift from knowledge artefacts to process
  • Use the IDEA framework for effective prompt design (Park & Choo, 2024)
  • Leverage speech-to-text / text-to-speech for inclusive multimodal learning
GUIDELINE 6
Create novel language learning opportunities
  • Add value — don't just substitute traditional tasks (SAMR framework)
  • Use AI for first-pass feedback, freeing teachers for deeper interaction
  • Challenge classroom monolingualism via plurilingual AI scaffolding
  • Enable context-sensitive, learner-centred bottom-up syllabus design
  • Avoid tokenistic use — ensure clear pedagogical goals for every AI activity
Key competences (19–27)
Personalise teaching Differentiate learning Effective prompting (IDEA) Ethical assessment Evaluate outcomes Assess instructional value Performative vs transformative Pedagogical intent Retain teacher judgment
IDEA prompt framework
Include essential PARTS (Person, Aim, Recipient, Theme, Structure) · Develop with CLEAR prompts (Concise, Logical, Explicit, Adaptive, Restrictive) · Evaluate and REFINE iteratively · Apply with accountability
Principle IV Reflective use of AI in language education

How can teachers and learners use AI reflectively and maintain professional agency?

GUIDELINE 7
Empower teachers as autonomous, critical agents
  • Use AI as a source of on-demand microlearning and professional support
  • Broaden methodological repertoire via AI-generated worked examples
  • Assign AI the role of "critical colleague" to review lesson plans
  • Generate CLIL, flipped classroom or differentiated instruction examples
  • Move from end-user to co-designer of AI tools and policies
GUIDELINE 8
Support agentic use of AI by teachers & learners
  • Use AI for reflection-for-action: generate and compare lesson variants
  • Make real-time pedagogical judgements during AI-assisted lessons
  • Use AI transcripts/analytics to analyse and reflect on completed lessons
  • Support classroom-based inquiry and teacher-led scholarship
  • Reflect on how AI use positions language teaching within social values
Key competences (28–35)
Access professional knowledge Microlearning Broaden repertoire AI as mentor Reflection-for-action Reflection-in-action Reflection-on-action Critical positioning
Example reflective prompt
"Assume the role of a critical friend and experienced language educator. Help me reflect on today's lesson … Ask probing questions about: (a) what worked well, (b) what to do differently, and (c) how AI influenced the dynamics."